Our question for this issue is: "Can someone who is theologically Arminian be truly saved?" This is not an easy question.
We want to emphasize at the beginning that Arminianism is another
gospel that is no gospel (Gal. 1:6-7). Its teaching denies the
sovereignty of God in salvation and the power and effectualness of
Christ's death on the cross (by teaching that Christ died for all it
teaches that His death actually saves no
one). It also denies that salvation is by grace alone with its teaching
concerning the sovereignty of the human will. These are fundamental
doctrines of the Christian faith.
Not only that, but we believe
that Arminianism has crept into the teaching of many Reformed churches
under the guise of a love of God for all men, a desire on God's part
that all men without exception be saved, and the teaching that there are
gifts of grace and benefits of the cross for all. This poses a deadly
danger to Reformed churches.
We agree, therefore, with the
following quote: "False doctrine is worse when it goes under the cover
of the truth, and when it quotes Scripture, and sings Amazing Grace.
Satan is always at his best in opposing the truth when he does it in the
name of Christ. There has never been a more subtle expression of false
doctrine than which affirms all the 'truths' of the Christian faith on
the basis of human effort, merit of works, foreseen faith, or 'free
will.' To affirm grace on the condition of works is the ultimate
perversion. It is The Lie" (John K. Pederson, Sincerity Meets the Truth,
pp. v, vi).
But does this mean that those who hold to free
will and other teachings of Arminianism cannot be and are not saved? We
do not believe that. Even here, however, we wish to be very careful in
our answer. We would insist that a person who truly and consistently
believes that he is saved by his own willing and running, contrary to
Rom. 9:16, cannot be saved; he has denied the very heart of the gospel.
The teaching that man is saved by his own running is Rome's, the
teaching that he is saved by his own willing is that of apostate
Protestantism, but really they are no different. That teaching,
according to Romans 10:1-4, is ignorance of and refusal to submit to the
righteousness of God, and leaves a person in need of salvation. By his
emphasis on will and works a consistent Arminian sets himself outside
Christ (Gal. 5:4).
Nevertheless, many people inconsistently
confess both grace and works. They ascribe their salvation wholly to
God's grace, and yet speak of having chosen Christ, of having free will,
and of God being dependent in salvation on their own free will choice.
They thank GOD for their salvation and yet speak as though they were the
ones who made the decisive choices.
Usually this is the fault
of the teaching they have received - teaching which speaks along two
lines. It is a teaching that affirms grace on the basis of works and
free will. Those who teach such things have the greater fault.
Nevertheless, those who think along these lines, though they may be
saved, also need to realize that what they believe is not the truth, and
need to repent of it.
So too, as the author quoted above says:
"We need rather to be greatly ashamed of ourselves for our tolerant
friendship with the doctrine of human sovereignty which lies at the
rotten core of evangelicalism, and which, on account it, of our sleepy
indifference to is a testimony to our own cowardice." Grace saves, not
free will and works.
Ronald Hanko
http://www.prca.org/resources/publications/cr-news/item/731-can-arminians-be-saved
http://www.prca.org/
According to this line of reasoning, salvation would no longer depend upon grace, but upon the person's level of knowledge or understanding.
ReplyDeleteAccording to this line of reasoning, salvation would no longer depend upon grace, but upon the person's level of knowledge or understanding.
ReplyDeleteI much question whether the man that dies an Arminian can go to heaven. But certainly he will not be an Arminian when he is in heaven. The employ of the blessed is to cast their crowns at the feet of God and the Lamb, and to sing, "Not unto us, O Lord."
ReplyDeleteShould it be thought harsh to question the salvation of one who dies under the blindness of Arminianism; as if a man who only robs God in part might miss of glory; let it be considered that, even on earth, if a person robs me only of my watch, or of a single guinea, he has forfeited his life to the law, as much as if he had robbed me of all I am worth. -Augustus Toplady (writer of the hymn Rock of Ages)
http://nocontrarywinds.blogspot.com/2015/03/thoughts-on-arminians-by-augustus.html