Showing posts with label TULIP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TULIP. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 9, 2014

Perseverance of the Saints and its Relation to the other Four Points


The doctrine of perseverance is inseparably connected with the other Four Points of Calvinism. The elect are preserved, but they are preserved because God has chosen them and because Christ died for them. They need that preserving grace because in themselves they are totally depraved and can do no good, certainly not the great good of finding and obtaining life everlasting. The grace that God gives them is powerful and irresistible, so that not only their own sins, but even the devil and the whole wicked world, cannot prevent them from being saved with an everlasting salvation.
To deny the doctrine of perseverance is to say that God’s counsel can be changed, that God Himself can change. It is to say that Christ groaned and bled and died on Calvary for nothing, that God’s promise can fail, and that the gifts and calling of God can be revoked, and that by weak, sinful man himself. God forbid that it should be so. Thanks be to Him for the work of grace, sovereignly begun, sovereignly brought forward, and sovereignly finished.

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, pp. 174-175

Irresistible Grace and Its Relation to the other Four Points


Certainly the truth of irresistible grace establishes the truth of the sovereignty of God. If God is sovereign, and He is, the grace of God must be an irresistible grace. To deny the irresistible grace is really to deny the sovereignty of God. Then God and God’s will are dependent on man and man’s will. Then Christ is reduced to a beggar. The Holy Spirit is a weakling. God is put in the position of Darius who earnestly desired to save Daniel from lion’s den, but could not (Dan. 6). Because God is God, the almighty God, His grace is irresistible grace.
Irresistible grace is necessitated by man’s total depravity.
Exactly because man is a sinner, unworthy of salvation, his salvation must be by grace. And since man is such a sinner that there is no good in him, no ability for good, no desire even for good, the grace of salvation must be an irresistible grace.
Unconditional election establishes the basis for irresistible grace. As God’s salvation of men eternally did not rest on any worth or works in those men, and was completely unconditional, so His salvation of them in time does not rest on any of their worth or works. And that is exactly the teaching of irresistible grace.
Irresistible grace preserves the truth of limited atonement.
If free will and resistible grace are true, it would be possible that Christ died in vain. Then, although Christ died for a man and wants to save that man, He would be frustrated because of the unwillingness of the sinner to be saved.
Irresistible grace also guarantees the preservation of the saints. Since the grace of God that brings salvation to a man is sovereign, almighty grace, the grace of God that continues to abide in a man is a sovereign, almighty grace also. Just as it cannot be frustrated in its initial operations, neither can it be frustrated ultimately. Those who are brought to salvation by the irresistible grace of God are, by the power of that grace, preserved in the salvation unto the end.

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, p. 144

Irresistible Grace


It is plain that the power of grace must be a great power. Man is the sinner; God must be the Savior. Man is incapable; God must be able. Main is powerless; God must be omnipotent. Man is weak; God must be sovereign.


The saving of the sinner DEMANDS great power. The devil must be defeated; a rebel must be subdued; a heart of stone must be made a heart of flesh; a new creature must be brought forth; the dead must be raised. This work calls for great power, power that is beyond the power of a mere creature: miraculous power, supernatural power, divine power.
On the part of God, GREAT power is required. Mere begging, pleading, or coaxing of men will not do. There must be the exercise of almighty power, such power as was exhibited in the creation of the world. Really every child of God is living evidence of the almighty power of God. On the part of anyone who has been the object of the saving grace of God, there can be no question of the sovereignty of God. Anyone who by God’s grace knows himself, KNOWS the sovereignty of God.
Granted that the power of grace is a great power, the question remains whether or not it is IRRESISTIBLE power. Granted that the sinner is dead, granted that God must work in salvation, granted that His work is powerful, could it not yet be that this work can be resisted and frustrated by the sinner? Could it not be that God works to give all men the ability to come to Christ if they choose to do so? Might not grace only enable men to come to Christ, always conditioned on their free will, so that man could very well choose not to come to Christ, and to resist His grace? The crucial question remains this: Is the grace of God IRRESISTIBLE?

The answer of the Scriptures and the Reformed faith is , Yes!
Grace, if it be grace, must be irresistible grace. Because God is an irresistible, all powerful, totally sovereign God, His grace is irresistible, powerful, and sovereign. God and God’s grace cannot effectively and ultimately be resisted by the most obstinate of sinners. When God’s grace operates to save the sinner, that grace will triumph in the salvation of that sinner. He will be saved. God will have the victory. Not the power of the devil, not the power of the wicked world, not the power of the sinner himself, shall be able to prevent, overthrow, or frustrate the work of God’s grace. The God of the Scriptures is the God of whom Isaiah says in Isaiah 46:10, 11, “I am God, and there is none like ME, Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all My pleasure.” He is the God before whom Daniel says in Daniel 4:35, “All the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and He doeth according to His will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay His hand, or say unto Him, What doest Thou?”

The god of resistible grace is not the God of the Scriptures. The former is a weak god, an ineffective god, a powerless god. In reality, he is no god at all, but an idol. This is the seriousness of the denial of God’s irresistible grace!

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, pp. 126-128

Limited Atonement and Its Relation to the other Four Points


The doctrine of limited atonement, as we have already to some extent seen, is inseparably related to the other four points of Calvinism. It is, therefore, really impossible to be a three- or four-point Calvinist and reject this doctrine while maintaining all or most of the others.

The connection between unconditional election and limited atonement is clear. Unconditional election explains what it is that limits the atonement, that is, the sovereign will and choice of God Himself. Universal atonement says that not God’s will, but man’s, limits the atonement and almost always, therefore, denies unconditional election, teaching instead a conditional election that God only foresees and then selects who will choose Christ and who will profit from Christ’s death.
Election is in vain if salvation and the cross still depend on a man’s freewill choice. Whether or not God chose anyone would make no difference. All would still hinge on man’s decision to accept or reject Christ.
As far as total depravity is concerned, that doctrine is the reason why the atonement must be efficacious for all those whom God has given to Christ, for the doctrine of total depravity teaches us that man has of himself no power to accept Christ or to believe in the cross. If the power of the cross really depended on our acceptance of Christ, and if men are totally depraved, no one at all could possibly be saved by the cross.
Likewise, the doctrines of irresistible grace and perseverance follow from limited atonement. The doctrine of limited atonement means that Christ purchased everything by His death, including the grace that brings us to salvation and preserves us in salvation to the end. It also means that those for whom Christ died are saved and must be saved. It demands, therefore, a grace that is powerful and irresistible and that never fails.

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, pp. 122-123
http://rfpa.org/collections/books-by-ronald-cammenga/products/saved-by-grace-paperback

Limited Atonement and Preaching


Whether or not one believes in limited atonement makes a tremendous difference in the way one preaches the gospel. If the cross is indeed the power of God unto salvation, as the Scriptures tell us it is, then the preaching will be the proclamation of the cross and of Christ’s death on the cross. Then the power by which sinners believe will be the power of God speaking to them through that proclamation and by His Spirit working in their hearts.
If, however, the power of the cross depends on man’s accepting or believing it, the preaching will degenerate into a kind of “sales pitch,” as in many cases it does. One need only witness the various revival meetings that are so popular, the advent of the altar call, and the begging and pleading with sinners that is introduced into the worship of the church and into evangelism. In them one sees what the preaching becomes when the truth of limited, efficacious atonement is denied. It becomes, in the words of another writer, a “hawking” of Jesus Christ and of the cross on the order of, and very much like, what goes on at carnival.
This is not to deny that there must also go forth as part of the preaching of the cross the call to repent and believe, but if one truly believes in limited atonement, that will indeed be a call in the sense of a command and not a thinly disguised offer of salvation to all, or a vain attempt to “sell” Christ by begging sinners. The charisma and oratorical skill of the preacher are not the main thing in preaching, as so many seem to think today, but the fact that the preacher preaches nothing but Christ crucified as the power of God unto salvation. What one believes about the atonement, therefore, has a profound effect on the very nature and manner of gospel preaching.

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, p. 119

Unconditional Election and its Relation to the other Four Points


The truth of total depravity necessitates unconditional election. By nature man is dead in sin, capable neither of saving himself nor desiring to be saved. He is in no position to accomplish or to cooperate in his salvation. If man is really totally depraved—we must do justice to this truth—the cause of salvation must be in God, as the truth of election teaches that it is.
The truth of election also limits the scope of the death of Christ. Here there is perfect agreement between the will of the Father and the work of the Son. If some only are chosen to salvation and Christ has died only for those whom God has chosen, Christ’s death must be limited to some men only. His redemption is a particular redemption. He has not died, neither did He intend to die, for all men but for some only, for the elect.
If God has chosen us to salvation, so that the almighty will of God Himself rather than the fickle will of man stands behind our election, we may be certain that we shall be saved. No power of the devil, of the wicked world, or of ourselves is able to withstand the power of the almighty God. Hence, the truth of sovereign election implies the irresistibility of grace.
The doctrine of election also gives us confidence of our perseverance in faith and salvation. If my salvation depended on my will, my decision, my choice, then I could never have the assurance of perseverance. Always I would be in doubt whether the same will that brought me into salvation , might take me out of salvation. However, since the cause of my salvation does not rest in my own will but in the almighty will of an unchangeable God, I can rest assured that I will persevere to the end. WE may be confident that the good work He has begun in us shall by the power of His grace be fully accomplished (Phil. 1:6).

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, p. 96

http://rfpa.org/collections/books-by-ronald-cammenga/products/saved-by-grace-paperback 

Monday, December 8, 2014

Total Depravity


When we describe man’s sinfulness as depravity, we are not just saying that he is bad or wicked, but that he is rebelliously and deliberately evil, that he loves and delights in wickedness of every kind. He is not just passively overcome by sin but actively and willingly uses his strength, ability, and gifts to sin.
The truth, then, is that men are very wicked, much more wicked than they themselves would ever admit. Nor is this wickedness incidental, but deeply imbedded in what a man is, what we call his “nature.” In other words, his depravity is not something he has learned or that is the result of his environment, but he is by nature wicked. He does not just do evil but IS evil. He is conceived and born a sinner.

Gen. 5:5: “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”

Notice the emphasis on the totality of man’s depravity. When Scripture says that man’s wickedness is “great,” it explains this to mean “total” (“every imagination… only evil continually”). This is God’s own judgment of man’s condition (“God saw”). It may not be our judgment, and we may not agree with it, but that makes no difference.

Jeremiah 13:23: “”Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots? Then may ye also do good, that are accustomed to do evil.”

It is as impossible for man, in his own strength, to do any good as it is for him to change the color of his skin. That is the truth of total depravity—not just that man does not do good, but that he cannot. Thus, the passage teaches us that man’s depravity is NATURAL to him. He is born depraved in the same way that a leopard is born spotted, and an Ethiopian black.

Jeremiah 17: 9, 10: “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? I the LORD searcheth the heart, I try the reins, even to give to every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings.”

With these words God asserts His right as judge and gives His judgment, telling us that our depravity does not merely consist in outwardly wicked actions, but that is a matter of our hearts. Because our hearts are the fountain of all our life (Prov. 4:23), and because that fountain itself is impure, it is impossible that anything clean or good should come forth from it. Because man’s heart is “desperately wicked,” his “ways” and his “fruits” will also be found wicked.

Galatians 3:22: “But the Scripture hath concluded ALL under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.”

This is New Testament proof that sin is slavery, that depravity is total in the sense that it is true of all men, and that this is not our judgment of ourselves and others, but Scripture’s judgment.

…The doctrine of total depravity is never preached apart from the other doctrines of grace. Those doctrines of grace and salvation are God’s remedy for our depravity and bring us all joy.
The divine “diagnosis” of total depravity must precede the application of the proper remedy to the sinner. Without such a correct diagnosis, the remedy will never be recognized or received. The Scriptures themselves show this. In Luke 5:32 Jesus says, “I came not to call the righteous [that is, those who think that they are righteous], but sinners [that is, those who know themselves to be sinners] to repentance. The parable of the Pharisee and the publican was specifically addressed to “certain which trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others” (Luke 18:9). In that parable the man who acknowledged himself a sinner went home justified. The Pharisee, who did know himself to be totally depraved, did not.

A close relationship exists between this first point and the other four points. There are those who call themselves three- or four-point Calvinists and even hold to some degree to these truths, but in the end, because these five truths are so closely interwoven with each other, it is impossible to maintain any of them consistently without maintaining them all.
The relationship is this: the doctrine of total depravity makes sovereign grace the only possible way of salvation. It requires an ELECTION that is unconditional, not depending on man’s work or worthiness; an ATONEMENT that does not just make salvation possible for all men, but actually saves those whom God has chosen; and a GRACE that is so powerful as to be utterly irresistible and that saves to the uttermost those who receive it, so that they are preserved and do PERSEVERE to the end.

Ronald Cammenga
Ronald Hanko

Saved By Grace, pp. 29-30, 33, 35, 39, 46, 56

http://rfpa.org/collections/books-by-ronald-cammenga/products/saved-by-grace-paperback 

Monday, October 27, 2014

Our Reformed Heritage

Beloved Children of the Reformation!


I address you as such because it is exactly my purpose to appeal to you in your capacity as heirs of the glorious heritage of the gospel, the faith once delivered to the saints, as preserved and passed on along the line of the Reformation of the sixteenth century. I do so, too, because by the grace of God I count myself a son of the Reformation, and count the churches who have called this rally as Reformation churches in the full and pure sense of that term. I am Protestant! And I am Reformed! And therein lies the point of contact between you and me.

We celebrate this year the 448th anniversary of an event that constituted the outburst of the Reformation-flame that set the whole Christian world ablaze. That event was the nailing of the ninety-five theses to the door of the castle-church in Wittenberg by Dr. Martin Luther, who had been roused to righteous indignation at the shameful selling of indulgences for the purpose of raising money for the pope's treasury. That event was but the outburst of the Reformation-flame that had first been kindled in Luther's own heart when he came to know, by way of the Scriptures, the blessedness and the peace of one who is justified by faith only—justified by a wonder of pure, sovereign grace. But that outburst of the Reformation-flame kindled the blaze of faith and fervour, of love and obedience to the Scriptures, of self-denial and cross-bearing, that has warmed one generation after another in many lands down to the present time.

No, we do not believe in hero worship. The world may have its heroes, and worship them. If we would do the same, we would thereby become unfaithful sons and daughters of that very Refor­mation that marked the end of the church's bondage in the sixteenth century. For neither Luther, nor Zwingli, nor Calvin, nor any of the lesser lights that shone in the firmament of church history at that time, or since that time, were the prime movers of the movement that has meant the church's liberty. On the, contrary, we all know that they were merely instruments. They were instruments prepared and called by Jesus Christ, the King of His church, by Him who walks in the midst of the golden candlesticks and keeps the seven stars in His right hand.

Hence, we commemorate with thankfulness and with the purpose of renewed dedication the work of God, the God of our salvation, in preserving and enriching and revealing anew the glorious heritage of the faith once delivered to the saints, the faith of the gospel. And therefore I can do no better than to call your attention to:

I. A PRECIOUS HERITAGE

Let us consider, first of all, wherein that heritage consists. I cannot describe it for you in full in this pamphlet. For it is so rich and so great that one could write a book on that heritage and not be finished. And therefore, for lack of time, I must limit myself and try to describe for you the main aspects of that heritage briefly.

The first and most basic aspect of that heritage is the Bible.

The two great reformers, Luther and Calvin, undoubtedly differed in various respects. But on this most basic aspect of our heritage they were certainly agreed.

They agreed, in the first place, on the absolute authority of Holy Scripture. This is the principle that there is no other authority ultimately for doctrine or for life, for faith or for practice, than Holy Scripture, and that too, because Holy Scripture is the infallibly inspired Word of God. Hence, it is characteristic of children of the Reformation, as one of our creeds has it, to 'believe without any doubt all things contained in' the sixty-six books of the Old and New Testaments. In the second place, this implies the truth of the necessity of Holy Scripture, the principle that without Scripture and apart from Scripture the truth concerning the God of our salvation can neither be known nor maintained. And, in the third place, the Reformers were agreed on the truth of the clarity, or perspicuity, of Holy Scripture. This principle implies that the text of the Bible is clearly understandable as far as the truth of God's revelation is concerned, so that any child of God, any believer, can read and understand the Bible in its clear and unequivocal meaning. More­over, this implies that the text of Holy Scripture has but one meaning fundamentally. Besides, it implies that in the reading and interpretation of Scripture every believer is independent of any institution, that he may even oppose that institute, because all believers have the Spirit of Christ.

On these matters, I say, the Reformers were thoroughly agreed.
And in this sense, therefore, the Reformation restored the Bible to the people of God.
This is basic! For, as is plain from the last part of Ephesians 2, the church is built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone. Take that Bible away, therefore, or distort it, or deny its absolute and complete authority or its infallibility, and you attack the very basis, the very foundation, of the church's heritage!

The second and most central aspect of the contents of our Reformed heritage is the truth of sovereign, particular grace.

Again, Luther and Calvin may have differed in various aspects. They may have differed in their approach. They undoubtedly differed in their personal history. But let us clearly understand that Martin Luther with his 'by faith only' and John Calvin with his 'by grace only' were essentially agreed. That is very plain from Ephesians 2. I refer especially to verses 8 and 9: 'For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.'

Sometimes this central aspect of our Reformation heritage is remembered under the figure of a tulip, the TULIP of the Five Points of Calvinism, which I shall call the FLOWER OF THE REFORMATION. Let us look at that flower.

It has five petals, which spell the name T-U-L-I-P. Those petals are:

1) TOTAL DEPRAVITY. This is the truth that man, apart from the regenerating grace of God, is by nature incapable of doing any good and prone to all evil. It is the truth that the natural man cannot, and will not, and cannot will to do anything but sin.

2) UNCONDITIONAL ELECTION (and with it, necessarily, the truth of sovereign, righteous reprobation).This is the truth that God from eternity and in absolute sovereignty chose certain definite persons unto everlasting life and glory in Christ Jesus, and that He chose, in fact, an entire church in Christ Jesus. But along with this truth, inseparably connected with it, is the truth that God in absolute sovereignty destined the others, those whom He did not choose, unto eternal damnation in the way of their own sin and unbelief.

3) LIMITED ATONEMENT. This is the truth that our Lord Jesus Christ laid down His life for His sheep, thereby bringing the sacrifice of infinite value that made complete satisfaction of the justice of God with respect to all the sins of His people, and thereby obtaining for them all, and for them only, all the blessings of salvation.

4) IRRESISTIBLE GRACE. This fourth petal is the truth that God through the Spirit of Christ regenerates and by the Word of the gospel sovereignly and unconditionally and effectually bestows the gift of saving faith, of repentance and conversion, together with all the benefits of salvation, upon His elect people by a wonder of grace, a wonder that is in no sense dependent upon the will of man.

5) PRESERVATION AND PERSEVERANCE OF THE SAINTS. This fifth petal of the Reformation Tulip is the truth that God surely preserves all His people, so that there is no falling away from grace, and so that His people persevere unto the end, endure temptation, overcome it, fight the battle of faith, and obtain the final victory in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Such is the beautiful Flower of the Reformation!

Let us take careful note of this beautiful flower, and notice that it is a flower; it is one. If you pluck one petal off, or injure it, you do not only spoil that one petal and destroy its beauty. But by plucking off a petal, that is, by denying one of these truths, or by damaging a petal, that is, by compromising one of these truths, you spoil the entire flower! You spoil its beauty. You leave the flower incomplete. The whole flower will surely wilt and die!

Our Reformed fathers—let me say in parentheses—saw this very clearly, particularly with respect to the petal of Unconditional Election. They expressed this somewhat differently, by saying that election is the heart of the church. They meant by this that in all the life of the church and in all the structure of the faith, of the truth, the pulse of election must beat strong! If it does not, you may be sure that there is heart trouble! And heart trouble is serious: it can be fatal!

But permit me to carry that figure of a flower farther for a moment. For, after all, there is something rather tragic about a mere cut flower. Let us note that the stem on which that flower is borne is the Word of God. And the bulb, or root, which produces that flower is our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God in the flesh, the Christ of the Scriptures, in all His fullness. And the ground out of which it is produced is the eternal, sovereign good pleasure of the Triune God.

Finally, let me stretch that figure of a flower one bit farther, in order to picture to you the third aspect of our precious heritage. Out of that flower develops fruit, fruit that redounds to the glory of the God of our salvation.

For the Reformation emphasized anew and further developed the truth that is also taught in Ephesians 2: 'For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them' (v. 10). It emphasized anew the calling of God's people unto spiritual separation, the calling to be pilgrims and strangers in the world, the calling to be and to shine as lights in the midst of darkness. It stressed and taught anew the calling of God's people to put on no unequal yoke with unbelievers. It called upon God's people to fulfil their part of the covenant of grace, as being of the party of the living God in the midst of the world. In a word, it stressed the calling of God's people to live and to walk in every sphere of life as those who have all things in common with the wicked, except grace.

And the purpose of this emphasis on the peculiar calling of God's people in the midst of the world is exactly that they might show forth the praises of Him that called them out of darkness into His marvellous light!

Such is our Reformation heritage!

Let me briefly emphasize the preciousness of that heritage.
That heritage is precious because it means, as our Reformed fathers often said, that God is the Beginning, the Middle, and the End of all our salvation. It is precious, too, because for the people of God that pure, unadulterated faith once delivered to the saints means solid, immovable assurance and comfort, comfort that is founded on the Rock of our salvation. That heritage is precious because it is the very essence of that only comfort in life and death of which our famous comfort-book, the Heidelberg Catechism, speaks.
That, then, is our heritage.
It has come down to us in the Scriptures.
It was preserved and emphasized anew in the Reformation.
It was transmitted at the expense of reproach and persecution, loss of goods and of wealth, of name and place and of very life, transmitted in the face of fierce enemies, from the Reformation, along the line of the famous Synod of Dordrecht in 1618-1619, through the Secession of 1834 in the Netherlands, and again through the separation known as the Doleantie in 1886.
And I tell you that I, that we, of the Protestant Reformed Churches, having and loving that heritage, as a gift of God, in all its purity, without reservation and without adulteration, count it a high privilege and responsible calling of God to remind you, as children of the Reformation, of the preciousness of that Reformation heritage!

II. THREATENING DANGERS
Today, when one looks about him on the ecclesiastical scene, he is inclined to lament with the prophet of old, 'How is the gold become dim!'
Why?
Indeed, dating back to the time of the Reformation there are many, many churches. Historically, there are many would-be sons of the Reformation. But there is very, very little esteem any longer for that precious heritage!
Moreover, it is plain to see that there are grave dangers threatening. No, the cause of God is not threatened! God will certainly maintain His own cause. Whether He maintains His cause through us, or through others, He will surely maintain it. Of that you may be sure. Never fear! But there are dangers threatening us and threatening our generations in the possession of that heritage, dangers against which we, by the grace of God, must fight!

Let me briefly mention some of those dangers which threaten. They are easily recognized, and you will know from their very mention whether or not they are threatening.

There is, in the first place, the danger of ecumenicalism, which has all regard for outward unity, but no regard for the real unity of the church in Christ, namely, unity in the truth and unity in confession.

Secondly, there is the danger of the denial of Scripture. In our pseudo-scientific age this threatening danger becomes manifest, for example, in various attempts to deny or to compromise the Genesis record. Or it becomes manifest in an outright denial of the infallibility of the Scriptures. Another manifestation of this threat­ening denial of the authority of Scripture is the astounding degree of doctrinal tolerance that is prevalent today—a tolerance that can recognize as 'Christian' the most blatant contradictions of the truth as it is revealed in Scripture.

In the third place, there is a very real danger of anti­confessionalism. This danger becomes manifest in the attitude that calls our confessions, the very embodiment of our heritage, archaic documents, good for another age but out-of-date today. It becomes manifest in the attitude that refuses to abide by those confessions, that calls for new formulations, and that sometimes engages in the most open contradiction of those confessions.

There is, in the fourth place, the deadly danger of Arminian free-willism. From this quarter have always come the most consistent and the most dangerous attacks. This has been true everywhere, but especially on the American ecclesiastical scene. Arminianism always aims at the destruction of the truth of sover­eign grace and sovereign predestination. It always takes the form of a generalizing of the gospel. It proclaims a grace of God for all men and a Christ for all men. I warn you that it seeks to cut off every one of the petals of the beautiful flower of the Reformation! Our Reformed fathers considered it so dangerous that they composed an entire creed, the Canons of Dordrecht, against this heresy; and they pledged every Reformed minister of the gospel to exert himself to expose these errors of Arminianism and to warn the children of the Reformation against them.

A fifth threatening danger is that of apathy. This apathy among those who are historically the children of the Reformation assumes in our day especially three forms. There is the apathy that arises from and becomes manifest in total ignorance and indifference with respect to the truths of our heritage and the preciousness of that heritage. A second form of ecclesiastical and doctrinal apathy finds expression in the slogan, 'My church, right or wrong!' And yet another form of that same apathy finds expression in the motto, 'Peace at any price!'

Finally, I would warn against the danger of world-conformity. We live in an age when it seems that Christians are very loathe to be a spiritually separate people and very eager to make common cause with the world, to imitate the world, in almost every sphere and relationship of life. One wonders how it will be with such Christians in the age of the final manifestation of the Antichrist, when men shall not be able to buy or to sell unless they have the mark of the beast in their right hands or in their foreheads. And remember: Scripture tells us that the end of all things is at hand!

III. A SOLEMN CALLING

With regard to these things, what, we may ask, is our calling? In general, I would state that calling as follows.

First of all, as far as the churches of the Reformation are concerned, their only salvation ecclesiastically is not to compromise when that heritage is concerned. They must actually be what they are, that is, Reformed!
Secondly, as far as the children of the Reformation are con­cerned (the members of those churches of the Reformation), their solemn calling in the midst of the world and in the midst of the church—and, if need be, over against the church—is to manifest themselves as faithful sons and daughters of the Reformation. And how shall they so manifest themselves? If they are indeed sons and daughters of the Reformation, they will count their Reformation heritage precious above all else; and as a result they will hold fast to it, hold fast to the faith once delivered to the saints—again, without compromise!

In particular, this implies several elements.

In the first place, it is the sole calling of the church to preach the Word and to expound the Scriptures, and that too, without any human admixture and adulteration, and in full harmony with our Reformation (our Reformed) confessions.

The children of the Reformation, in the second place, have a very personal responsibility and calling in this respect. They are called, for one thing, to know, to be convinced of, and to be thoroughly founded in and to stand in the truth of our heritage. They are called, too, to preserve and to maintain that truth of our heritage, the only truth of the Word of God and of our confessions, over against every attack that is made upon it.

Moreover, as children of the Reformation you are obligated to call the whole church—and particularly your own church, if need be—to repent and to return to the truth. And in this respect the children of the Reformation must be willing to be militant, to fight, and, if need be, to exercise their God-given right of reformation in the church.

I know: such a course is not easy, and it is not pleasant, and it is not popular today. There is far too much of the attitude which would leave these matters to certain 'leaders' or to leave differ­ences involving our heritage at the level of mere discussion and propaganda. But the sons and daughters of the Reformation must do more than that. They must let their voices be heard ecclesiastically!They must not fall victim to the pessimism that gives up and that says it is hopeless to maintain and to fight for that heritage. I tell you that if that had been the attitude of Luther or of Calvin or of our Reformed fathers of the past, there would never have been a Reformation! And if that attitude continues to prevail today, and sons and daughters of the Reformation are fearful to speak out ecclesiastically, then that heritage will soon be gone and forgotten. It will be forfeited!

And, finally, it is the calling of the children of the Reformation to seal all this by a spiritually separate walk in the midst of the world. They must be willing to walk as strangers and pilgrims in the earth.

CONCLUSION

There are three things I wish to mention in conclusion.

In the first place, our Protestant Reformed Churches stand ready to give to any who will stand foursquare on and for the heritage support, counsel, and, if need be, ecclesiastical shelter. We will exercise fellowship with you in the unity of the faith. We have and we love that heritage of the Reformation in all its purity. I say this not in pride, not in boasting. For what we are and what we have as churches is by the grace of God! We have nothing of which to boast, except in the Lord.

In the second place, let me sound a word of caution. Your actions as sons and daughters of the Reformation affect not only yourselves, but they affect your generations. They affect your children and your children's children! And remember, the church in its generations has never yet stood still, either in the line of the truth or in the line of error.
Finally, let me sound a word of encouragement in the struggle, the encouragement of our Lord Himself. That word is this: 'In the world ye shall have tribulation; but be of good cheer, I have overcome the world!'

Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye steadfast, immovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord: forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord.
May God grant this! Amen.


Prof. Homer C. Hoeksema

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

The Poisonous Petals of the Arminian Lilac

In God's creation the lilac, like the tulip, has a beautiful place.

 






















It is not a poisonous plant but a splendid flower of sweet perfume and purple hue. Its color symbolizes royalty and dominion. As such, the lilac would be a fit emblem of the Reformed faith and its key doctrine-- the absolute sovereignty of God. But the lilac may be viewed as the emblem of the Arminian heresy, and then it takes on quite a different character. It becomes an ugly, stinking flower. Its color is the pale gray of disease and death. Its petals are poisonous.
The late John Gerstner, a Presbyterian minister, invented the acronym LILAC to summarize the five points of the Arminians. He did this because the tulip flower has been the symbol of the Five Points of Calvinism. The two "flowers" look like this: 

T -Total Depravity
U - Unconditional Election
L - Limited Atonement
I - Irresistible Grace
P - Perseverance of the Saints

L - Limited Depravity
I - I Choose Christ
L - Limitless Atonement
A - Arrestible Grace
C - Carnal Security


In this chapter we examine briefly these poisonous metals of the Arminian LILAC. The reader will understand that we cannot launch into a detailed critique of the Arminian heresy here. For that consider the Canons of Dordt themselves, particularly the second part of each head of the doctrine, where the Arminian errors are explicitly mentioned and refuted. We can only point out the main errors. Nevertheless, with the sweet smell of TULIP in our souls we will come to know the stench of the Arminian LILAC.

It was the Arminian party in the Dutch Reformed churches who first summarize their teachings into five points of doctrine. This they did following the death of Jacob Arminius, the man who initially advanced the erroneous doctrines and after whom the Arminian party was named. Arminius had been teaching the errors associated with his name for many years following his ordination into the ministry in 1588. Especially in his preaching on the book of Romans, he parted with the historic Reformed teaching concerning the state of the natural man and concerning the way in which the sinner is saved. But it was after Arminius' death in 1609 that his followers put his views together in summary form. In 1610 they set forth in five articles their Remonstrance (petition) as a defense for their position, which is why the Canons of Dordt consist of five heads of doctrine and why we speak of the five points of Calvinism. The first point of the Remonstrants expressed the Arminian view of predestination:

That God, by an external, unchangeable purpose in Jesus Christ His Son, before the foundation of the world, hath determined, out of the fallen, sinful race of men, to save in Christ, for Christ's sake, and through Christ, those who, through the grace of the holy Ghost, shall believe on this His Son Jesus, and shall persevere in this faith and obedience of faith, through this grace, even to the end; and, on the other hand, to leave the incorrigible and unbelieving in sin and under wrath, and to condemn them as alienate from Christ, according to the word of the gospel of John 3:36: "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him," and according to other passages of Scripture also.

At first glance it may seem as if the Arminians were stating an orthodox doctrine of predestination. The language appears sound and straight. But in reality their view of divine election and reprobation is that they are conditional decrees. Notice that the article says that God chooses those who will believe and passes over those who will not believe. That is, God's choice of some persons to be saved is based on (conditioned by) their faith and their perseverance in faith; and His rejection of others damnation is based on (conditioned by) their unbelief and disobedience. For the Arminians, God;s decree of predestination is not sovereign and unconditional; it is not freely made without any regard to man's acts in time. Rather it is conditioned by what man does. In eternity God looks ahead and sees who will believe and who will not believe and predestinates accordingly. In this opening statement the Arminians revealed the heart of their heresy: God is not sovereign in salvation; man is. God's will does not rule in the redemption of mankind; man's does. The poisonous, putrid petal of the Arminial LILAC is: I choose God (Christ), and therefore He chooses me.

How pervasive that poison is in the churches today! Oh, that the smell of the beautiful, biblical TULIP would prevail as it did in the time of Dordt: God chose me to believe, sovereignly, unconditionally, entirely of grace!

This point, however, was just the beginning of the Arminian poison. On their second point the Arminians continued their vile errors: 

That, agreeably thereto, Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world, died for all men and for every man, so that He has obtained for them all, by His death on the cross, redemption and the forgiveness of sins; yet that no one actually enjoys this forgiveness of sins except the believer, according to the word of the gospel of John 3:16, "God so loved the world that He gave His only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." And in the First Epistle of John 2:2: "And He is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world."


In this statement the Arminians boldly set forth universal atonement: Christ has died for all men, head for head. His death on the cross covered the sins of all people that ever live. His sacrifice obtained forgiveness and freedom for every person in all of time and history. Christ's death, then, is not just for the elect of God; it is not limited to that select people determined by God. It is for all men without exception.

Yet at the same time the Arminians had to reckon with the fact that all men do nto enjoy this salvation in the death of Christ. Some men perish in their unbelief and never receive the benefits Christ obtained for them. This assertion implies that Christ has died in vain for some; His death is not sufficient to secure some people's salvation. What is this but a denial of the efficacy and all-sufficiency of Christ's atonement? This poisonous petal of the Arminian LILAC insists that Christ's limitless atonement fails! 

This is not the sweet fragrance of the gospel, as Arminians claimed; this is the stench of the lie. Besides, in this article the Arminians again grounded salvation in the faith of the sinner, not the sovereign work of God in Christ at the cross. At best Christ's death only makes salvation possible for the sinner. The determining factor in salvation is not what Christ did in dying but what the sinner does by believing. Christ has died in vain unless the sinner believes! This poisonous petal is also prominent in the churches of our day. Oh, that the sweet savor of the biblical, Reformed TULIP might prevail today as it did at Dordt: Christ died only for those elect given Him by the Father-- sufficiently, efficaciously, with everlasting security of their salvation.

In their third point the Arminians returned to their devilish deceptions and subtle subterfuges. They hid the truth of their position behind solid language:

That man has not saving grace of himself, nor of the energy of his free will, inasmuch as he, in the state of apostasy and sin, can of and by himself neither think, will, nor do any thing that is truly good (such as saving Faith eminently is); but that it is needful that he be born again of God in Christ, through His Holy Spirit, and renewed in understanding, inclination, or will, and all his powers, in order that he may rightly understand, think, will, and effect what is truly good, according to the Word of Christ, John 15:5: "Without Me ye can do nothing."

It appears from this statement that the Arminians were upholding the Reformed doctrine of total depravity, that man is thoroughly corrupt in himself and incapable of doing any good part apart from the grace of God. It appears that they were defending sovereign grace in the salvation of the sinner, so that only God by His regenerating Spirit causes man to repent and believe. It even seems that they condemn free will.

But this was a grievous deception. In reality, the Arminians taught just the opposite. A close reading of the Rejection of Errors section in Heads 3 and 4 of the Canons of Dordt reveals their true position on the nature of man's depravity and on the nature of God's saving grace. From the Rejection of Errors we learn that the Arminians taught that man is only partially depraved and that he has retained his power of free will after the fall. Therefore, the unregenerate sinner is not totally dependent on the grace and Spirit of God for salvation. He is able to prepare himself for salvation and cooperate with God in salvation. According to Arminians, fallen man can hunger and thirst after righteousness and life by himself; he can offer the sacrifice of a contrite and broken spirit apart from the Spirit. He can use his natural powers to meet God halfway on the road of salvation. God gives the sinner a common grace to show him Christ and encourage him to conversion, but it is up to man to exercise his free will and decide whether or not he will be saved. In the Arminian scheme, faith is not God's sovereign gift worked in man's heart by the power of the regenerating Spirit but an act of man that actually precedes regeneration.

So again, the Arminians denied the sovereignty of God's saving grace, this time by promoting the poisonous petal of "limited depravity." The fathers of Dordt saw this for what is was: nothing but a resurrection of the old Pelagian heresy which denied man's total depravity and advanced man's power of free will. Oh, that once more this poisonous perfume of the Arminian LILAC might be snuffed out in the churches and the precious scent of the Reformed TULIP be powerfully smelled and savored!

The fourth article of the Arminians must be viewed in the light of what we have just seen:

That this grace of God is the beginning, continuance, and accomplishment of all good, even to this extent, that the regenerate man himself, without prevenient or assisting, awakening, following and cooperative grace, can neither think, will, nor do good, nor withstand any temptations to evil; so that all good deeds or movements, that can be conceived, must be ascribed to the grace of God in Christ. But as respects the mode of the operation of this grace, it is not irresistible, in as much as it is written concerning many, that they have resisted the Holy Ghost. Acts 7, and elsewhere in many places. 

Again, it seems as if the Arminians are defending sovereign grace, at least in the first part of the article. God's grace, they appear to say, accounts for all the good that man does.

But notice the words that are used to describe God's grace as it comes to the sinner. The article speaks of "assisting" grace and "cooperative" grace, implying that God simply needs to help man along in the attainment of salvation and that man works along with the God to achieve this. The fourth point exposes the Arminians in their real position-- that of Pelagianism. In addition, the Arminians plainly stated their rejection of sovereign, irresistible grace. The grace of God as it comes to the sinner is able to be resisted by the sinner. God tries to save the sinner when He comes to him in the gospel. The Spirit approaches man with the grace of salvation, but God can be turned away by man's sovereign will. The Spirit comes with regenerating grace but cannot give it until man first believes by an act of his free will. And if a man does not want to believe, the Spirit is stopped in His tracks! Such is the stinking flower of the Arminians: arrestible grace.

How powerful is this poisonous petal in the churches! Oh, that the precious odor of the biblical TULIP might waft through the churches as it did at Dordt: God's sovereign grace is irresistible and conquers the wicked heart and will of the elect sinner, so that he is infallibly brought to faith and conversion by the Spirit alone!

In their last article the Arminians expressed their belief concerning the perseverance of the saints:

That those who are incorporated into Christ by a true faith, and have thereby become partakers of His life-giving Spirit, have thereby full power to strive against Satan, sin, the world, and their own flesh, and to win the victory; it being well understood that it is ever through the assisting grace of the Holy Ghost; and that Jesus Christ assists them through His Spirit in all temptations, extends to them His hand, and if only they are ready for the conflict, and desire His help, and not inactive, keeps them from falling, so that they, by no craft or power of Satan, can be misled nor plucked out of Christ's hands, according to the Word of Christ, John 10:28: "Neither shall any man pluck them out of My hand." But whether they are capable, through negligence, of forsaking again the first beginnings of their life in Christ, of again returning to this present evil world, of turning away fro the holy doctrine which was delivered them, of losing a good conscience, of becoming devoid of grace, that must be more particularly determined out of the Holy Scripture, before we ourselves can teach it with the full persuasion of our minds. 

It should be evident that once more the Arminians revealed their true colors, this time by rejecting the absolute perseverance of believers. They are willing to say that God makes it possible for the saved to persevere. He gives them sufficient grace. He assists them in the battle of faith so that they can possibly overcome and reach the goal of eternal salvation. But notice two things concerning the Arminian position set forth in this article. First, they make perseverance dependent on the activity of the believer. Christ extends His hand to help the believer and will keep him, but only if he wants help, makes himself ready for the battle, and works hard on his own. Once more, the position of human sovereignty in salvation is proclaimed. God cannot make the believer persevere unless the believer wills and works first. Second, the Arminians state in so many words that they do not believe the total preservation of believers and therefore the absolute security of the saved. He can be saved today and perish tomorrow. He can be saved all his life, but in the very end he can be lost and join the wicked in hell. This last petal in the Arminian LILAC is another poisonous one: carnal security. It leaves the believer with no assurance of being saved to the end. It leaves him trusting in himself for final deliverance. That is carnal security.

Of course, this final article follows from all that the Arminians teach. If at every point salvation is dependent on the will of man, then salvation is ever on shaky ground; it can never be safe and secure. Salvation can only be certain if it is dependent on God's will and God's work from the start to finish and at every point in between. Such is the pure flower of biblical Calvinism: God keeps His own unto the end so that none are lost. He gives them grace to persevere so that they all arrive in glory. This is the sweet perfume of the Reformed TULIP. The petals of the Arminian LILAC emit a deadly poison. 

Which flower are you savoring? 



Charles J. Terpstra
Always Reforming, (Reformed Free Publishing Association, 2009): 9-16