Showing posts with label Jonathan Edwards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jonathan Edwards. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Postmillennialism (3)

Postmillennialism in the Reformed Tradition (cont.)


Contemporary advocates of postmillennialism in Reformed and Presbyterian churches, particularly the disciples of the Puritans and the Christian Reconstructionists, can appeal to a prominent, powerful strand of the Reformed tradition in support of their doctrine of the last things. Unlike premillennial dispensationalism, the other important challenge to Reformed amillennialism, postmillennialism must be taken seriously by the Reformed church in the twenty-first century.

Edwards and the Puritans

In the preceding installment in this series on the doctrine of the last things, I quoted Jonathan Edwards' postmillennial hope in his The History of Redemption1 as representative of many, though not all, of the Puritans. George Marsden accurately describes Edwards' (and many of the Puritans) bright view of the earthly future of the church. During the coming millennium, "almost everyone would truly follow Christ. As a result, wars would cease, nations would dwell together as brethren, 'the wolf should dwell with the lamb.' There would be 'vast increase of knowledge,' and 'all heresies and false doctrines shall be exploded.' In short, the triumph of Christ's kingdom [in the "golden age" of the millennium—DJE] 'is an event unspeakably happy and glorious.'"2

Edwards called the coming earthly reign of Christ through His church the "church's latter-day glory."3

Marsden indicates an important motivation of Edwards' doctrine of a future millennium prior to the coming of Christ. Edwards was concerned that the number of those who are saved be greater in the end than the number of the lost.4

Typical of the postmillennial Puritans was Edwards' expectation of a future great revival that would usher in the millennium. In order to bring this necessary revival about by the extraordinary work of the Spirit, Edwards organized a vast, worldwide prayer chain. All Christians everywhere in the world were to pray at the same time that the Spirit would send the great revival.
It is a very suitable thing, and well-pleasing to God, for many people, in different parts of the world, by express agreement, to come into a visible union in extraordinary, speedy, fervent, and constant prayer, for those great effusions of the Holy Spirit, which shall bring on that advancement of Christ's church and kingdom that God has so often promised shall be in the latter ages of the world.
Edwards concluded that this prayer for the great revival and, thus, for the millennium was a "duty" of all Christians.5

Recognizing that the biblical teaching of future lawlessness in the world and nominal church, of apostasy on the part of churches and professing Christians, of the rise of Antichrist, and of great tribulation for the true church is a "great damp" on millennial hopes and prayer chains, Edwards neatly consigned the realization of all such New Testament passages to the past, specifically, the time of the Protestant Reformation. "This notion [of a future Antichrist and tribulation—DJE] tends to discourage all earnest prayer in the church of God for that glorious coming of Christ's kingdom, till it be actually come; and that is to hinder its ever being at all."6 That is, like all postmillennialists, Edwards was, and had to be, at least a "partial" preterist.

A full, consistent preterist in eschatology is one who explains all New Testament prophecies of Christ's coming and the things attending that coming as having been fulfilled in the past, whether in AD 70 in the destruction of Jerusalem, or in the time of the persecution of the early New Testament church by the Roman empire. A "partial," inconsistent preterist is a theologian who does exactly what the preterist does with eschatological prophecy, except for the prophecy of the coming millennium and the prophecy of the bodily return of Christ—especially the prophecy of the coming millennium.7

Dutch Reformed

It was not only the Puritans in the broadly Reformed tradition who taught postmillennialism. Prominent, influential Dutch Reformed theologians also advocated a coming "golden age" for the church before the return of Christ. Wilhelmus àBrakel looked for "the glorious state of the church during the thousand years prophesied in Revelation 20."8 Ushering in this glorious, earthly state of the church, àBrakel held, will be a "conversion of the entire Jewish nation," involving "a restoration of the nation [of Israel], not only in a spiritual sense, but also in a physical sense"; the return of the Jews to Canaan; and the literal rebuilding of the earthly city of Jerusalem.9

Waxing ecstatic over the prospect of the "wondrous increase in the measure of grace," the "great numbers" of converts, and the fine earthly state of the church worldwide in the millennium, as well as of the grand, earthly kingdom of the Jews in Canaan, àBrakel exclaimed, "Oh, what a glorious time this will be!" Wistfully, he added, "Who will then be alive?"10—a question that ought to have made him reexamine his postmillennial eschatology. Are all the Old Testament saints and the multitudes of New Testament Christians who will have died before the millennium to miss out on the most wonderful realization of the kingdom of Christ?

Scottish Presbyterians

Postmillennialism has also been the eschatology of Scottish Presbyterians. Writing in the middle of the nineteenth century, David Brown explained the millennium of Revelation 20 as that time in the future, prior to the return of Christ, when the biblical prophecies of the coming glory of the Messianic kingdom will be fulfilled in "their full earthly sense." According to Brown, there will be a "universal reception of the true religion, and unlimited subjection to the scepter of Christ," so that all the religions of the pagans, the "imposture" of Islam, the false religion of the Jews, and the superstition of popery will be abolished. There will be universal, earthly peace; "much spiritual power and glory" because of a more copious outpouring of the Spirit; "the ascendancy of truth and righteousness in human affairs"; and "great temporal prosperity" for true believers and ungodly alike. As is invariably the case with the postmillennial vision, the beginning of the millennium will be the national conversion of Israel.11

Presbyterians in the US

Presbyterians of stature in the United States have also espoused postmillennialism. On the basis, significantly, not of Revelation 20 (the passage that speaks of the thousand-year period), but of Revelation 19:11-21, the vision of the conquering Christ, northern Presbyterian Benjamin B. Warfield forecast a "golden age before the Church," prior to the return of Christ. It will be "at least an age relatively golden gradually ripening to higher and higher glories as the Church more and more fully conquers the world and all the evil of the world." Such will be the church's victory over evil, in Warfield's mind, that he left it an open question whether the millennial "winning of the world implies the complete elimination of evil from it."12

The southern Presbyterian Robert L. Dabney shared his northern colleague's view of the last things. "Before this second advent, the following events must have occurred. The development and secular overthrow of Antichrist...which is the Papacy. The proclamation of the Gospel to all nations, and the general triumph of Christianity over all false religions, in all nations.... The general and national return of the Jews to the Christian Church." Dabney called these future events "this state of high prosperity" for the church on earth. He evidently saw this "prosperity" as the meaning of the millennium of
Revelation 20, since he appealed to the chapter in support of his expectation of it.13

The strong presence of postmillennialism in the Reformed tradition does not make the millennial error respectable, much less an option for Reformed churches in the twenty-first century. Postmillennialism is false doctrine concerning the return of Christ, and a practical danger to believers and their children. But the presence of postmillennialism in the tradition does demand that we take the challenge to Reformed amillennialism today, especially by the disciples of the Puritans and by the men of Chri
stian Reconstruction, seriously.

Prof. David J. Engelsma
 

1 Jonathan Edwards, The History of Redemption (Grand Rapids: Associated Publishers & Authors, n.d.), 305, 307.

2 George M. Marsden, Jonathan Edwards: A Life (New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 2003), 335.

3 Jonathan Edwards, Praying Together for True Revival, ed. T. M. Moore (Phillipsburg, New Jersey: P&R, 2004), 14.

4 Marsden, Edwards, 335, 336.

5 Edwards, Praying Together, 26. The emphasis is Edwards'.

6 Ibid., 128, 129.

7 For the Reformed criticism of "partial" preterism and the demonstration that "partial," inconsistent preterism necessarily commits one to full, consistent preterism, see my Christ's Spiritual Kingdom: A Defense of Reformed Amillennialism (Redlands, CA: The Reformed Witness, 2001), 129-158.

8 Wilhelmus àBrakel, The Christian's Reasonable Service, tr. Bartel Elshout, vol. 4 (Morgan, PA: Soli Deo Gloria Publications, 1995), 531.

9 Ibid., 348, 526, 530.

10 Ibid., 516.

11 David Brown, Christ's Second Coming: Will It be Premillennial? (Grand Rapids: Baker, repr. 1983), 424-440. The emphasis is Brown's. As the subtitle indicates, much of the book is also an incisive, helpful criticism of premillennialism. John Macleod says of Brown's book that it was "perhaps the most influential book" of that period in Great Britain on the return of Christ (John Macleod, Scottish Theology, Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, repr. 1974, 278). Brown was obviously heavily influenced by the postmillennialism of Jonathan Edwards.

12 Benjamin Breckinridge Warfield, "The Millennium and the Apocalypse," in Biblical Doctrines (New York: Oxford University Press, 1929), 662-664.

13 Robert L. Dabney, Lectures in Systematic Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, repr. 1972), 838.

Wednesday, March 11, 2015

Questions to Ask Your Pastor


  1. How does it appear that something has existed from Eternity?
  2. How does it appear that this earth and the visible system are not from eternity?
  3. How does it appear that the existence of man is derived and dependent?
  4. How do you prove the natural perfections of God, viz. His intelligence, infinite power, foreknowledge and immutability?
  5. How do you prove His moral perfections, that He is a friend of virtue, or absolutely holy, true, just and good?
  6. How do you prove that the Scriptures are a revelation from God? and what are the evidences, internal and external?
  7. How do you prove the divine Mission of Christ?
  8. How do you prove the divinity of Christ?
  9. How do you prove that the persons in the Trinity are one God?
  10. How do you prove that the persons in the Trinity are one God?
  11. Whence arose the Manichean motion of two Gods, and how is it confuted.
  12. Whence arose the polytheism of the Pagans and how confuted?
  13. Whence w as it that the knowledge of the one true God, in which Noah was instructed, was not preserved among his posterity in all ages?
  14. Why are not mankind in all ages (their internal faculties and external advantages being sufficient) united in right sentiments of the true God?
  15. Were the moral character of God and the moral law understood and loved, would there be any objections against revealed religion?
  16. What is the true idea of God's decrees?
  17. How do you prove absolute and particular election?
  18. Did God decree the existence of sin?
  19. Why did God decree sin?
  20. In what sense did He introduce sin into the universe?
  21. How do you reconcile this with the holiness and goodness of God?
  22. What is necessary to constitute a moral agent?
  23. Are men moral and free agents?
  24. What is the difference between natural and moral power and inability?
  25. How is absolute moral necessity, or inability, consistent with the free agency of man? 
  26. How is the doctrine of universal, absolute decrees consistent with the free agency of man?
  27. How do you prove an universal and special providence?
  28. What is the covenant redemption?
  29. If man was created in original righteousness, how is that consistent under which Adam in innocency was placed?
  30. What was the constitution under which Adam in innocency was placed?
  31. Was Adam under the same necessity of falling that we are of sinning?
  32. Are all intelligences bound to love God supremely, sinners and devils?
  33. Is the law holy, just and good, and how is it proved?
  34. Are they who are under its curse bound to delight in it?
  35. How great is the demerit of sin?
  36. Are the torments of hell eternal?
  37. How do you reconcile them with the justice and infinite goodness of God?
  38. How do you reconcile them with those texts which say Christ died for all men, that God will not that any perish?
  39. How does it appear that human nature is originally depraved?
  40. Whence comes that depravity?
  41. How is it proved to be total?
  42. What is the covenant of grace?
  43. Are the law and gospel inconsistent with each other?
  44. Why was an atonement and one so precious as the blood of Christ necessary?
  45. In what manner did Christ atone for sin?
  46. To whom does it belong to provide an atonement, God or the sinner?
  47. Did Christ redeem all men, alike, elect and non elect?
  48. Can the offer of Christ be made with sincerity to the non-elect?
  49. How is redemption applied?
  50. What is the office of the Holy Ghost in the work of Redemption?
  51. What is regeneration?
  52. Whence arises the necessity of it?
  53. What is true love to God?
  54. What is true benevolence to man?
  55. What is true repentance, and how distinguished from legal?
  56. What is true faith?
  57. What is pardon and justification? what is their foundation and what is the influence of faith therein?
  58. How are full satisfaction and free pardon consistent?
  59. Is the sinner forgiven before he repents?
  60. Is sanctifying grace needful at all to any man, unless to that which is his duty, and in neglect of which he would be without excuse?
  61. What is the sum of man's duty, and what the effect produced by the sanctifying influence of the Holy Spirit? 
  62. Can that holy volition in us, which is the effect of divine power be wholly our act or our duty?
  63. How is it proved that unbelief is sin, and that all errors in moral matters are of a criminal nature?
  64. Will the wicked heathens, Jews, Infidels and errorists of every kind be without excuse at the day of judgment?
  65. What is the essence of true virtue, or holiness?
  66. Is there no virtue in the exercise of natural conscience, the moral sense, natural compassion and generosity?
  67. Is not self love the root of all virtue?
  68. Do not the unregenerate desire to be regenerated and can they not properly pray for regenerating grace?
  69. Do they not desire the heavenly happiness?
  70. What is the utmost the unregenerate do in the use of the means of grace?
  71. Is any duty done by them therein?
  72. Do they grow better in the use of means?
  73. To what are they to be exhorted?
  74. What is the real advantage of the assiduous use of means to the unregenerate?
  75. How do you prove that the institution of the Sabbath is of perpetual obligation?
  76. How is it that the Sabbath is changed from the seventh to the first day of the week?
  77. How do you prove that publick worship is to be celebrated on the sabbath?
  78. What is the foundation and duty of prayer, since God is omniscient and immutable?
  79. How do you prove that family prayer is a duty? 
  80. To whom are the promises of the gospel made, to the regenerate or unregenerate?
  81. Are no encouragements given to the unregenerate?
  82. How do you prove the saints perseverance?
  83. What is the nature of a Christian Church?
  84. Who are fit for communion therein?
  85. What is the nature and import of baptism?
  86. How do you prove infant baptism?
  87. What is the nature of the Lord's supper?
  88. What are the rules and ends of Church discipline?
  89. What is the character of a good minister of Christ?
  90.  In what does the happiness of heaven consist? 


Jonathan Edwards
Theological Questions