Tuesday, March 3, 2015

“Israel” / “of Israel”




According to the doctrine of the unconditional covenant, the membership of the visible church, the members of the covenant community, and the physical children of godly parents are distinguished and differentiated by eternal, sovereign predestination, election and reprobation. This is the teaching of Romans 9. This chapter is not mainly about predestination, even though it is the classic passage on predestination in the Bible. Rather, it is the explanation of the covenant problem. The problem was this: How could so many children of Abraham perish in unbelief and disobedience in view of Jehovah’s covenant promise to Abraham, “I will be the God of your seed”? Indeed, in view of the promise, how could even one child of Abraham perish?
The explanation is that there was a twofold seed of Abraham: “children of the flesh” and “children of the promise” (v. 8). God counted only the children of the promise for the seed of Abraham in His covenant promise. God’s eternal, sovereign, gracious election: “the purpose of God according to election” (v. 11).
Not al the physical children alike of godly parents are in covenant relation with God, whether by gracious promise or by a work of grace in their hearts that unites them to Christ. Some are merely in the sphere of the covenant.
Against this distinction between being in the covenant and being in the sphere of the covenant, the theologians of covenantal universalism object, just as the “liberated” Reformed objected before them. In reality, their objection is against Paul and the Holy Spirit, for the apostle makes exactly this distinction in Romans 9:6. “They are not all Israel, which are of Israel.” Some physical children of Abraham were “Israel.” There elect in Christ, redeemed, objects of the promise, united to Christ by the Holy Spirit, and covenant friends of God.
The others were merely “of Israel.” They were part of the manifestation of Israel in history. In every possible physical, earthly way they were related to Israel. They were flesh-and-blood offspring of Israel. But they were not Israel. They never were Israel. They were not elect, redeemed, objects of the promise, united to Christ, and covenant friends of God. And the reason they were not Israel was not that they failed to fulfill the conditions, whereas Israel did fulfill the conditions. If that were the case, covenant salvation would have been by works. But the reason was God’s reprobation of them, whereas He elected Israel.
Israel/ of Israel!
The sovereign God makes the same distinction between two kinds of physical children of godly parents today.
Covenant/ sphere of covenant!
There is only one alternative to this explanation of the covenant problem. That is the teaching that the gracious promise comes to all alike conditionally, but some fail to fulfill the conditions. In this case, the word of promise is of none effect in many. Or, to put it in the language preferred by covenantal universalism, all alike are conditionally united to Christ, but some fail to perform the conditions and fall away. In this case, covenant grace is resistible in many.
This is the denial of sovereign grace – in the sphere of the covenant.
Then, as regards His saving work in the sphere of the covenant, it cannot be said of God, “Of Him, and through Him, and to Him, are all things: to Whom be glory forever” (Rom. 11:36). Rather, we must say, “Of Him and of those who fulfill the conditions; through Him and through those who fulfill the conditions, are all things, in the sphere of the covenant: to Him and to those who fulfill the conditions be the glory of covenant salvation forever.”
As covenantal universalism robs God of His glory in the covenant, so it strips every member of the covenant of assurance. All alike are united to Christ, and all alike can fall away into perdition. So I must live, according to this God-dishonoring, soul-destroying covenant theology: “I am united to Christ by faith today; I may fall away to hell tomorrow.”
In the conditional covenant, the prevailing mood is terror.
The unconditional covenant of particular grace has a different message. To every one united to Christ by faith – every one who believes the gospel from the heart – it promises, unconditionally, that He who has begun the good work in him will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ (Phil. 1:6).
In the unconditional covenant of grace – particular grace – we have assurance.

Prof. David J. Engelsma
The Covenant of God and the Children of Believers, pp. 207-209

Does the Bible Teach a Blessed Future for Israel?

Today many think that the State of Israel is the fulfilment of Old Testament prophecy, but keep in mind that, Abraham never possessed the land, not even enough "to set his foot on" (Acts 7:5). The patriarchs inherited the heavenly Canaan (Heb. 11:16), of which the earthly is but a type.

Hebrews 3:19 teaches that the Israelites "could not enter in because of unbelief." In Ezekiel 33:25-26, God asks the rhetorical question, "Ye eat with the blood, and lift up your eyes towards your idols, and shed blood, and shall ye possess the land? Ye stand upon your sword, ye work abomination, and ye defile every one his neighbour's wife, and shall ye possess the land?" Clearly impenitence and unbelief were barriers to inheriting the land, so how could unbelieving Jews possessing Palestine in 1948 be the fulfilment of prophecy?
To interpret prophecy with bald literalism requires consistency. Shall the Gentiles keep the feast of tabernacles at Jerusalem (Zech. 14:16-19)? Jesus indicates that geographically-determined worship will cease: "… believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father" (John 4:21). Wouldn't some future return to the feast of tabernacles be a step back into the shadows (Col. 2:17), and a turning again to the "weak and beggarly elements" of the law (Gal. 4:9-11)? Isaiah prophesies that "it shall come to pass in that day that the Lord shall set his hand the second time to recover the remnant of his people" (Isa. 11:11). If this glorious promise, as some maintain, was fulfilled in 1948 with the establishment of a national Israel, where is the restoration of the Philistines, Edom, Moab, and the children of Ammon who are to be her vassals? These nations have disappeared and were not restored in 1948. A literal fulfilment of Isaiah 11 requires that Israel "shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west ... they shall lay their hand upon Edom and Moab, and the children of Ammon shall obey them" (v. 14). God hated the Edomites and "laid [their] mountains and [their] heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness" (Mal. 1:3). Although the Edomites attempted to rebuild, God threw them down again (v. 4). Indeed, for Jacob's sake, whom He loved, God had indignation against the Edomites for ever (v. 4). That certainly rules out a literal restoration of Edom! Yet a literal future fulfilment of Isaiah 11 requires the restoration of the Edomites and the other obsolete nations (v. 14). To understand what Isaiah means by "the second time" that God brings back His people from captivity (v. 11), we should understand that the first time was the Exodus from Egypt (v. 16). Logically, then, the second return was from Babylon and not in 1948.
The New Testament sheds light on the Old Testament prophecies. How should we understand them since the literalist view leads to absurdities?
The New Testament, as indeed the Old, is chiefly concerned with spiritual  Israel. The wider "nation" consisted of the elect, "the children of the promise" who were "counted for the seed" (Rom. 9:8), and the reprobate, "the children of the flesh" (Rom. 9:8) who often led the nation into idolatry. In every age, God willed to save spiritual Israel. In the Old Testament, spiritual Israel was found mainly in the nation of Israel. If non-ethnic Jews were saved, such as Ruth and Rahab, they joined the nation of Israel. In the New Testament spiritual Israel consists of all believers in Jesus Christ. New Testament Christians, although consisting largely of Gentiles, are "Jews inwardly" and are circumcised "in the heart" (Rom. 2:28-29; cf. Deut. 30:6; Jer. 4:4). Paul tells largely Gentile believers in Philippi, they are "the circumcision" (Phil. 3:3). Furthermore, Christians are citizens of heavenly Jerusalem (Gal. 4:26) and those who "have come to mount Zion" (Heb. 12:22).
An unbelieving ethnic Jew, although he may dwell in Jerusalem itself, is not a spiritual child of Abraham (Gal. 3:7) for "they are not all Israel, which are of Israel" (Rom. 9:6). John the Baptist, Christ and the apostles, who themselves were Israelites "concerning the flesh" (Rom. 9:5; Phil. 3:5), repeatedly pointed this out to the unbelievers in Palestine in their day, and they were certainly not anti-Semitic (Matt. 3:9; John 8:39; Acts 7:51; Rom. 9:7). In Christ there is "neither Jew nor Greek" (Gal. 3:28-29), for "neither circumcision availeth anything, or uncircumcision, but faith which worketh by love" (Gal. 5:6).
"Israel" will never cease to be a "nation" (Jer. 31:36) but the "holy nation" meant is the church (I Peter 2:9) consisting of Jews and Gentiles, the one spoken of in Matthew 21:43 which was to replace the old theocratic nation of Israel. God has always had a "holy nation." In the Old Testament it was mainly Jewish, but in the New Testament, that same "holy nation" has become catholic, or universal. All peoples, tribes and tongues are included, yet there is always a remnant of Jews saved with the Gentiles (Rom. 11:5).
Many evangelicals believe in a future for national Israel because so many Old Testament prophecies, when read superficially, seem to be speaking about the nation. For example, Amos 9:11-15 promises that the "tabernacle of David" will be raised up and re-built "as in the days of old," and that "the captivity of my people of Israel" will be brought back. 
Incidentally, the promise is also made here that Israel will "possess the remnant of Edom and of the heathen" (Amos 9:12). We have seen that the prophet Malachi rules out any restoration of Edom. It is also absurd to imagine that king David would be resurrected to rule in Jerusalem, and it is inconsistent for the literalist to say that David refers to Christ. Again, a literal interpretation demands consistency!
However, Acts 15:14-18 provides the authoritative, apostolic interpretation of Amos' prophecy. It has nothing to do with the establishment of a national Israel, and everything to do with the gathering of the Gentiles into the New Testament Church. Isaiah 54 is similar: "Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes; for thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited" (vv. 2-3). Why is the tent to be enlarged? So the Gentiles can come in! James (in Acts 15) uses the prophecy of Amos to make the same point.
Similarly, Hosea promises that the children of Judah and Israel shall be "gathered together" as the number of "the sand of the sea" (Hos. 1:10-11; 2:14-23) but this has its fulfilment in Romans 9:25-28 and I Peter 2:9-10, not in 1948 when the modern state of Israel was founded. Again, the new covenant made with "the house of Israel; and with the house of Judah" (Jer. 31:31-34) was fulfilled in the New Testament salvation of the church of Jesus Christ (Heb. 8:8-12; 10:16-17).
But why did the prophets not just say that? The church of the Old Testament was "under a schoolmaster" (Gal. 3:24). It was taught using figurative language (the land, the temple, reunification of the nation under David, etc). All the types and shadows of the Law were to teach the Old Testament church about Christ. "Had the prophets spoken plainly of the New Testament age, without using figures, the Old Testament saints could not have borne such excess of light" (W. J. Grier, The Momentous Event [Banner], p. 39). The New Testament therefore gives us the key to interpreting Old Testament prophecy: the prophecies are spiritual (for a spiritual people), not literal.
None of this (a denial of an earthly future for the Jewish people) is anti-Semitism. Jews will be saved in the same way as Gentiles, by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. There is no other way of salvation for Jew or Gentile. It is not part of one's duty as a Christian to support the modern state of Israel, or to expect future blessings for it, but it is Christ's command to "love thy neighbour" and seek his salvation, no matter what his ethnicity may be.


 Martyn McGeown

A Doorkeeper in God’s House



3 MARCH

For a day in Thy courts is better than a thousand. Psalm 84:10

SUGGESTED FURTHER READING: 3 John


Unlike many people who want to live without knowing why, wishing simply that their life may be prolonged, David says that his purpose for living is to serve God. He sets higher value on one day that is spent in God’s service than a long time that is spent among worldly people from whom true religion is banished. Because it is lawful for only priests to enter into the innermost courts of the temple, David declares that, if he were simply permitted to have a place at the porch, he would be content with the humble station of acting as a doorkeeper.
The value that David sets upon being in the sanctuary of God is striking in his comparison that he would be a doorkeeper in the house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness. David would rather be cast into a common and unhonored place, providing that is among the people of God, than to be exalted to the highest rank of honor among unbelievers. That is a rare example of godliness indeed! Many people want to occupy a place in the church, but ambition has such sway over their minds tat few are content to be numbered among the common and the undistinguished class.
Almost all of us are carried away with the frantic desire of rising to distinction and cannot think of being at ease until we have attained some state of eminence.

John Calvin

FOR MEDITATION: When personal ambition takes over in our lives, we often succeed in turning the house of God into a “tent of wickedness.” If it is better for us to dwell in God’s house, even as a nobody, than to achieve recognition among the ungodly of this world, how then should we live? What changes should we make in our lives?

365 Days With Calvin
Selected and Edited by Joel R. Beeke

Monday, March 2, 2015

Guarding Against Hypocrisy

2 MARCH

Nevertheless they flatter Him with their mouth, and they lied unto Him with their tongues. Psalm 78:36

SUGGESTED FURTHER READING: Matthew 15:1-20

We are not to suppose that the psalmist is saying these people made no acknowledgment of God, but he does intimate that, because the confession of their mouth did not proceed from the heart, it was therefore constrained by duty to guard against the gross hypocrisy of uttering with the tongue before others one thing, while thinking something different in our hearts.
We also learn that we should beware of the hidden hypocrisy of the sinner, who, being constrained by fear, flatters God in a slavish manner, mortally smitten with this disease, for though divine majesty elicits some kind of awe from them, yet they would be grateful if the light of divine truth would be completely extinguished. It is not enough to yield assent to the divine word unless that is accompanied with true and pure affection, so that our hearts are not double or divided.
The psalmist promise out in the next verse the cause and source of dissimulation is that such people are not steadfast and faithful (Ps. 78:37). By this he intimates that whatever does not proceed from unfeigned purity of heart is considered lying and deceit in the sight of God. Since uprightness is everywhere required in the law, the psalmist accuses hypocrites with covenant-breaking because they have not kept the covenant of God with the fidelity that is required. As I have observed elsewhere, we can presuppose a mutual relation and correspondence between the covenant of God and our faith, in order that the unfeigned consent of the latter may attest to the faithfulness of the former.

John Calvin

FOR MEDITATION: Whether or not we are guilty of hypocrisy can be a daunting question. Do we love God, and are we thankful for Him and His will? Or do we serve Him because we fear Him, all the while wishing that He would cease to exist? Let us pray much for living, vital reality in our Christianity.

365 Days With Calvin 
Selected and Edited by Joel R. Beeke

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Signs of the Times (36)


We have finished our discussion of the signs of Christ’s coming that he gives us and that are recorded in Matthew 24. To conclude this series of articles, I want to deal with the three parables our Lord taught, and that are recorded for us in Matthew 25: the ten Virgins, the talents, and the final judgment. In this article, I intend to make a few remarks about the parable of the ten virgins. I discuss these parables in detail in my book, Mysteries of the Kingdom. I know you are busy, but I really wish you would take an hour out of your time and read, for now, the parable of the ten virgins. It is a parable that Jesus taught to enforce His command to His disciples to live in constant, conscious expectation of the Lord’s coming. Let me make a few observations about some of the elements in the parable.
 
First of all, the ten virgins represent the church visible. That is, the church as it appears in the world at any given time. These virgins do not represent a congregation such as CERC in Singapore, or a denomination such as the PRC in America; they represent all that calls itself Christian and claims to believe in the second coming of Christ. (There are churches that call themselves “Christian,” but deny Christ’s second coming. Christ has nothing to say to them; they are of no interest to him – or to us.)


 
Waiting for Christ is depicted in the parable by the virgins waiting for the bridegroom, who would come to get them. All those churches who profess to be waiting for Christ to come are pictured by these virgins. But only half of them are prepared; half are not. Not membership in a church, nor an outward profession to believe in Christ’s second coming make any difference. Preparation makes all the difference.
 
The ones prepared are those with oil in their lamps; the ones not prepared are those without oil in their lamps. These latter probably reasoned that they could get oil the last minute. Why waste time in the present to buy oil? There will be enough time to do that.
 
Whether the lamps and the oil signify anything or not is, I think, an open question, and commentaries disagree on the question. For my part, I think that the lamps are the Word of God, for Psalm 119:105 calls God’s word “a lamp unto our feet.” And the oil is, in Scripture, a picture of the anointing of the Holy Spirit, for oil was poured on the head of those who were so anointed. The one, then, who lives close to and out of God’s Word, and who, by the Spirit, believes it and acts according to it, is the one prepared for Christ’s coming.
 
It is a striking element in the parable that the bridegroom does not come at the time expected. In fact, from the viewpoint of the virgins, he does not come for a very long time after he is expected. This is Jesus’ way of reminding the disciples (and us) that no one knows the time of His coming, and that when the church expects Him to come, He does not come. This has happened many times in the history of the church. Already in the apostles’ times, some of the church, especially when persecuted, thought Christ would come at any time. In the years preceding the end of the first millennium, many thought Christ would return in 1000 AD. The same was true of the end of the second millennium; they though Christ would return in 2000 AD. He did not come when He was expected.


 
The trouble is that all ten of the virgins fell asleep; even the prepared ones. This idea of falling asleep is purposely included in the parable to warn us that in a sense, the whole church gives up that Christ will come again. He doesn’t come and He doesn’t come. Even God’s people are tempted to say that perhaps the world is right: He will never come (II Peter 3:1-4). And so, even the people of God are surely tempted to quit waiting for Him. If they would do that, it would be disastrous! It would mean that the church would give up completely in waiting for the Lord. And, indeed, many do give up. “What’s the use?” they will say; “He doesn’t come and is not going to come.”
 
But the Lord does come – as He said he would. Suddenly the whole church wants to enter the heavenly marriage feast (Rev. 19:9). But it is too late for those who have not prepared themselves for Christ’s coming. They beg to be let into the banquet hall, but the door is slammed in their faces. The bridegroom himself tells them that they never did really prepare themselves for His coming, and preparing one’s self cannot be done the last minute – even after the bridegroom has come. But to us the Lord says, “Watch therefore. For ye know not the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh” (Matt 25:13).
 
And so you and I (and all the church) stand before the question; “Are we prepared? Do we watch?” It is a terrible thing to have the door of heaven shut when the Lord comes again. The only other place to go is hell.
 
I want to say something about what it means for you and me to watch and thus be prepared for Christ’s coming. But that is really taught in the parable of the talents. So we will wait till next time for this. 

Prof. Herman Hanko

10 Touchstones to Test Godliness



There are ten duties that God calls for which a godly man will conscientiously perform, and indeed these duties may serve as so many other characteristics and touchstones to test our godliness by:

1. A godly man will often be calling his heart to account
He takes the candle of the Word and searches his innermost being: ‘I commune with mine own heart: and my spirit made diligent search’ (Psa. 77:6). A gracious soul searches whether there is any duty omitted, any sin cherished. He examines his evidences for heaven. As he will not take his gold on trust, so neither will he take his grace. He is a spiritual merchant; he casts up the estate of his soul to see hat he is worth. He ‘sets his house in order.’ Frequent reckonings keep God and conscience friends. A carnal person cannot abide this heart-work; he is ignorant how the affairs go in his soul. He is like a man who is well acquainted with foreign parts but a stranger in his own country.

2. A godly man is much in private prayer
He keeps his hours for private devotion. Jacob, when he was left alone, wrestled with God (Gen. 32:24). So when a gracious heart is alone, it wrestles in prayer and will not leave God till it has a blessing. A devout Christian exercises eyes of faith and knees of prayer.
Hypocrites who have nothing of religion besides the frontispiece love to be seen. Christ has characterized them: ‘they love to pray in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen’ (Matt. 6:5). The hypocrite is devout in the temple.
There everyone will gaze at him, but he is a stranger to secret communion with God. He is a saint in the church, but an atheist in private. A good Christian holds secret communication with heaven. Private prayer keeps up the trade of godliness. When private holiness is laid aside, a stab is given to the heart of religion.

3. A godly man is diligent in his calling
He takes care to provide for his family . The church must not exclude the shop. Mr. Perkins said: ‘Though a man is endued with excellent gifts, hears the Word with reverence and receives the sacrament, yet if he does not practise the duties of his calling, all is sheer hypocrisy.’ Religion never did grant a patent for idleness: ‘there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all; them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread’ (2 Thess. 3:11, 12). The bread that tastes most sweet is obtained with most sweat. A godly man would rather fast than eat the bread of idleness. Vain professing Christians talk of living by faith, but do not live the calling. They are like the lilies of the field: ‘they toil not, neither do they spin’ (Matt. 6:28). An idle person is the devil’s tennis ball, which he bandies up and down with temptation till at last the ball goes out of play.

4. A godly man sets bounds to himself in things lawful
He is moderate in matters of recreation and diet. He takes only so much for the restoration of health as may the better dispose him for God’s service. Jerome lived abstemiously; his diet was a few dried figs and cold water. And Augustine in his ‘Confessions’ says: ‘Lord, Thou hast taught me to go to my food as to a medicine.’ If the bridle of reason checks the appetite, much more should the curbing-bit of grace do so. The life of a sinner is brutish; the glutton feeds ‘without fear’ (Jude 12). And the drunkard drinks without reason. Too much oil chokes the lamp, whereas a smaller quantity makes it burn more brightly. A godly man holds the golden bridle of temperance, and will not allow his table to be a snare.

5. A godly man is careful about moral righteousness
He makes conscience of equity as well as piety. The Scripture has linked both together: ‘that we might serve Him in holiness and righteousness’ (Luke 1: 74,75). Holiness: there is the first table; righteousness: there is the second table. Though a man may be morally righteous and not godly, yet no-one can be godly unless he is morally righteous. This moral righteousness is seen in our dealings with men. A good man observes that golden maxim, ‘Whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do even so to them’ (Matt. 7:12). There is a threefold injustice in business matters:
(i) Using false weights: ‘the balances of deceit are in his hand’ (Hos. 12:7). Men, by making their weights lighter, make their sin heavier: “They make the ephah small’ (Amos 8:5). The ephah was a measure they used in selling. They made the ephah small; they gave but the scant measure. A godly man who takes the Bible in one hand dare not use false weights in the other.
(ii) Debasing a commodity: ‘they sell the refuse of the wheat’ (Amos 8:6). They would pick out the best grains of the wheat and sell the worst at the same price as they did the best. ‘Thy wine is mixed with water’ (Isa. 1:22). They adulterated their wine, yet made their customers believe it came from the pure grape.
(iii) Taking a great deal more than the commodity is worth. ‘If thou sell ought unto thy neighboour... ye shall not oppress one another’ (Lev. 25:14). A godly man deals exactly but not exactingly. He will sell so as to help himself, but not to damn another. His motto is, ‘a conscience void of offence toward, and toward men’ (Acts 24:16).
The hypocrite separates these two which God has joined together – righteousness and holiness. He pretends to be pure but is not just. It brings religion into contempt when men hand out Christ’s colours, yet will use fraudulent circumvention and, under a mask of piety, neglect morality. A godly man makes conscience of the second table as well as the first.

6. A godly man will forgive those who have wronged him, but revenge is sweet to nature
A gracious spirit passes by affronts, forgets injuries and counts it a greater victory to conquer an enemy by patience than by power. It is truly heroic ‘to overcome evil with good’ (Rom. 12:21). Though I would not trust an enemy, yet I would endeavour to love him. I would exclude him from my creed, but not from my prayer (Matt. 5:44).

Question: But does every godly man succeed in forgiving, yes, loving his enemies?
Answer: He does so in a gospel sense. That is :
(a) In so far as there is assent. He subscribes to it in his judgment as a thing which ought to be done: ‘with my mind I serve the law of God’ (Rom. 7:25).
(b) In so far as there is grief. A godly man mourns that he can love his enemies no more: ‘O wretched man that I am!’ (Rom. 7:24). Oh, this base cankered heart of mine, that has received so much mercy and can show so little! I have had talents forgiven me, yet I can hardly forgive pence.
(c) In so far as there is prayer. A godly man prays that God will give him a heart to love his enemies. ‘Lord, pluck this root of bitterness out of me, perfume my soul with love, make me a dove without gall.’
(d) In so far as there is effort. A godly man resolves and strives in the strength of Christ against all rancour and virulence of spirit. This is in a gospel sense to love our enemies. A wicked man cannot do this; his malice boils up to revenge.

7. A godly man lays to heart the miseries of the church
‘We wept, when we remembered Zion’ (Psalm 137:1). I have read of certain trees whose leaves, if cut or touched, the other leaves begin to contract and shrink, and for a time hang down their heads. Such a spiritual sympathy exists among Christians. When other parts of God’s church suffer, they feel themselves, as it were, touched in their own persons. Ambrose reports that when Theodosius was terminally ill, he was more troubled about the church of God than about his own sickness. When Aeneas would have saved Anchises’ life, he says, ‘Far be it from me that I should desire to live when Troy is buried in its ruins.’ In music there are two unisons; if you strike one, you perceive that the other is stirring, as if it were affected. When the Lord strikes others, a godly heart is deeply affected: ‘my bowels shall sound like an harp’ (Isa. 16:11). Though things go well with a child of God in his own private life and he lives in a house of cedar, he still grieves to see things go badly with the public. Queen Esther enjoyed the king’s favour and all the delights of the court, yet when a warrant portending bloodshed was signed for the death of the Jews, she mourns and fasts, and ventures her own life to save theirs.

8. A godly man is content with his present condition
If provisions get low, his heart is tempered to his condition. ‘Many,’ says Cato, ‘blame me because I am in need, and I blame them because they cannot be in need.’ A godly man puts a candid interpretation upon providence. When God brews him a bitter cup, he says, ‘This is my diet drink: it is to purge me and do my soul good.’ Therefore he is most content (Phil. 4:11).

9. A godly man is fruitful in good works (Titus 2:7)
The Hebrew word for godly (chasid) signifies ‘merciful’, implying that to be godly and charitable are of equal force, one and the same. A good man feeds the hungry, clothes the naked: ‘He is ever merciful’ (Psa. 37:26). The more devout sort of Jews to this day distribute the tenth part of their estate to the poor and they have a proverb among them, ‘Give the tenth, and you will grow rich.’ The hypocrite is all for faith, nothing for works, like the laurel that makes a flourish but bears no fruit.

10. A godly man will suffer persecution
He will be married to Christ, though he settles no other estate on him than the cross. He suffers out of choice and with a spirit of gallantry (Heb. 11:35). Argerius wrote a letter to his friend, headed: ‘From the pleasant gardens of the Leonine prison’. The blessed martyrs who put on the whole armour of God blunted the edge of persecution by their courage. The juniper tree makes the coolest shadow and the hottest coal. So persecution makes the coal of love hotter and the shadow of death cooler.
Thus a godly man goes round the whole circle of religious duties and obeys God in whatever He  commands.

Thomas Watson
The Godly Man’s Picture, pp. 168-173